
When I began my journey of discovering my family history over two decades ago, I didn't know how building a family tree on Ancestry is more than collecting digital leaves on Ancestry. Ancestry made it look so easy to uncover our family history, and this false hope led to several wrong people and records being added to my tree. Last year, I began undertaking what I call my "Roots Research Revamp" - a comprehensive audit of my entire family tree.
Like many beginners, I initially fell into the trap of copying other people's family trees. The excitement of quick discoveries overshadowed the crucial need for verification and proper sourcing. That enthusiasm led me down an incorrect Stoner family line - a branch I'm still working to untangle today.
My research skills have evolved significantly through engagement with genealogical and historical societies. Their webinars, conferences, and workshops have provided invaluable tools and methodologies I wish I'd known from the start. The virtual genealogy community on social media has also been a valuable asset to helping me. These organizations offer more than just access to records - they provide education in:
Document analysis techniques
Research methodology
Local history context
Record set interpretation
Brick wall problem-solving strategies
My Approach For my Roots Research Revamp, I'm following a structured process:
Document Review
Examine every attached record with fresh eyes
Transcribe documents completely, not just names and dates
Create detailed source citations
Note conflicting information
Evidence Analysis
Evaluate the reliability of each source
Create research timelines for each ancestor
Document negative searches
Identify gaps in research
Community Connection
Share progress on social media for accountability
Engage with other researchers studying same localities
Participate in society study groups
Document local history context
Technology Integration
Utilize DNA evidence alongside traditional records
Create research logs in digital formats
Map ancestral locations
Tag records for easy retrieval
This methodical review has already revealed overlooked clues. In the case of my misidentified Stoner line, taking time to analyze peripheral records might have prevented years of research in the wrong direction. This experience has taught me that genealogy isn't a race - it's a methodical journey of discovery.
By sharing my Roots Research Revamp journey on social media, I've found an encouraging community of fellow genealogists undertaking similar projects. This accountability helps maintain momentum when facing challenging research problems.
As I continue this project through 2025, I'm discovering that cleaning up my family tree isn't just about correcting mistakes - it's about honoring our ancestors by telling their stories accurately and completely.
Have you undertaken a similar tree cleanup project? What discoveries have you made by revisiting your early research?
This post is my contribution to Amy Johnson Crow's "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" challenge. This wonderful initiative provides weekly prompts to help genealogists share their ancestors' stories and stay motivated in their research journey. This week's prompt inspired me to share my Roots Research Revamp project and the important lessons I've learned about thorough documentation and research.
Want to join the challenge? Visit Amy's website at www.amyjohnsoncrow.com/52-ancestors-in-52-weeks/Â to learn more about how you can participate in this engaging community project.
Comentários